Case Results

Traumatic Brain Injuries

• Tractor Trailer Fails to Yield to Oncoming Traffic

Awarded: Judgment 4.5 million-subsequently settled for policy limits

• Head on Colision Brain Injury

Awarded: Settled $2.6 Million

• I-95 Rear ender causes mild TBI

Awarded: $1.6 Million

• Traumatic Brain Injury Alleged from Low-impact Rearender

Awarded: $1.25 Million Jury Verdict

back to top

Personal Injury

• UIM Coverage at issue in Drunken Driving Crash

Awarded: 1,025,000 Settlement

• Gymnast suffers leg injuries as a result of head-on collision

Awarded: $875,000 Settlement

• Woman becomes paraplegic after being rear-ended by van

Awarded: $2,955,760 Settlement

back to top

Product Liability

• Seat Collapse - Baird v Chrysler

Awarded: Settlement $2 Million

• Seat Collapse - Miller vs. Chrysler

Awarded: Settlement Confidential

back to top

Medical Malpractice

• Obstetrical-Cerebral Palsy

Awarded: $2.75 Million

• Forceps Delivery Results in Brain Injury

Awarded: $ 2.1 Million Settlement

• Child suffers brain injury from bacterial infection

Awarded: $2 Million Jury Verdict

• Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice

Awarded: 850,000 Settlement

• Myocardial infarction w/heart failure - Confidential

Awarded: $575,000 Settlement

• Necessity for Second Back Surgery - Confidential

Awarded: $543,000

• Surgery for colon cancer botched in 79-year-old patient

Awarded: $500,000 Settlement

• Failure to Diagnose Neural Tube Defect

Awarded: $400,000 Settlement

• Unnecessary Surgery, Surgical Scar - Confidential

Awarded: Settlement - Confidential

back to top

Auto Accidents

• Tractor Trailer Fails to Yield to Oncoming Traffic

Awarded: Judgemnet 4.5 Million

back to top

Miscellaneous

back to top

The following accounts have either been published previously by various entities unrelated to Nichols Zauzig or have been prepared by us for dissemination to visitors to our website. The results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors. It is generally impossible to know all factors that have influenced a specific result or an accumulation of specific results. Each legal matter consists of circumstances that are peculiar or unique to the specific case. The result obtained under one set of circumstances cannot be a predictor of the result likely to be obtained in a case that necessarily involves different circumstances. You should draw no conclusions about your particular legal matter from reading these accounts.